Active forum topics
- Problems in progression
- Ceva’s Theorem Is More Than a Formula for Concurrency
- The Chain Rule Explained: Don't Just Memorize, Visualize It
- The Intuition Behind Integration by Parts (Proof & Example)
- Statics
- Calculus
- Hydraulics: Rotating Vessel
- Inverse Trigo
- Hydraulics: Water is flowing through a pipe
- Application of Differential Equation: Newton's Law of Cooling
New forum topics
- Ceva’s Theorem Is More Than a Formula for Concurrency
- The Chain Rule Explained: Don't Just Memorize, Visualize It
- The Intuition Behind Integration by Parts (Proof & Example)
- Statics
- Calculus
- Hydraulics: Rotating Vessel
- Hydraulics: Water is flowing through a pipe
- Inverse Trigo
- Problems in progression
- General Solution of $y' = x \, \ln x$
Recent comments
- mm equivalent of 6m1 week 3 days ago
- thankyouu!2 months 2 weeks ago
- z2 months 3 weeks ago
- Force P only impends motion…2 months 3 weeks ago
- Wow! :>3 months 1 week ago
- In general, the centroid of …3 months 2 weeks ago
- isn't the centroid of the…3 months 2 weeks ago
- I get it now, for long I was…4 months ago
- Why is BD Tension?
is it not…4 months ago - Bakit po nagmultiply ng 3/4…5 months 3 weeks ago


Try point plotting. Rewrite
By inspection, the graph cannot exist at quadrants where x and y are negative because when x is negative x3/2 is imaginary, the same true to y. We can therefore see that the graph will only lie on the 1st quadrant
Try point plotting and rewrite the equation into y = (8 - x1.5)2/3
For finer graph, you may increment by 0.5 instead of by 1. Hint: If you are using a calculator with table capability you can tabulate the data above. For CASIO fx-991ES use
MODE7:TABLE