Active forum topics
- Problems in progression
- Ceva’s Theorem Is More Than a Formula for Concurrency
- The Chain Rule Explained: Don't Just Memorize, Visualize It
- The Intuition Behind Integration by Parts (Proof & Example)
- Statics
- Calculus
- Hydraulics: Rotating Vessel
- Inverse Trigo
- Hydraulics: Water is flowing through a pipe
- Application of Differential Equation: Newton's Law of Cooling
New forum topics
- Ceva’s Theorem Is More Than a Formula for Concurrency
- The Chain Rule Explained: Don't Just Memorize, Visualize It
- The Intuition Behind Integration by Parts (Proof & Example)
- Statics
- Calculus
- Hydraulics: Rotating Vessel
- Hydraulics: Water is flowing through a pipe
- Inverse Trigo
- Problems in progression
- General Solution of $y' = x \, \ln x$
Recent comments
- thankyouu!1 week 1 day ago
- z2 weeks 2 days ago
- Force P only impends motion…2 weeks 2 days ago
- Wow! :>1 month ago
- In general, the centroid of …1 month 1 week ago
- isn't the centroid of the…1 month 1 week ago
- I get it now, for long I was…1 month 3 weeks ago
- Why is BD Tension?
is it not…1 month 3 weeks ago - Bakit po nagmultiply ng 3/4…3 months 2 weeks ago
- Determine the least depth…1 year 1 month ago


No it is not.
No it is not.
Arranged the numbers in
Arrange the numbers in increasing value: 1/6, 1/3, 1, 2. For a sequence to be arithmetic, the difference of two consecutive terms (any term - preceding term) must be equal. Let us check:
(a) 1/3 - 1/6 = 1/6
(b) 1 - 1/3 = 2/3
(c) 2 - 1 = 1
Since the difference of two adjacent terms are not equal, the given terms do not form into arithmetic sequence.
Arithmetic sequence must be
Arithmetic sequence must be in increasing and deceasing value.
No. The sequence must be 1/3,
No. The sequence must be 1/3, 1/6, 1, 2.
a, a+d, a+2d, a+3d. Where a = 1/3, and d = 1/3.