Active forum topics
- The Chain Rule Explained: Don't Just Memorize, Visualize It
- The Intuition Behind Integration by Parts (Proof & Example)
- Statics
- Calculus
- Hydraulics: Rotating Vessel
- Inverse Trigo
- Application of Differential Equation: Newton's Law of Cooling
- Problems in progression
- General Solution of $y' = x \, \ln x$
- engineering economics: construct the cash flow diagram
New forum topics
- The Chain Rule Explained: Don't Just Memorize, Visualize It
- The Intuition Behind Integration by Parts (Proof & Example)
- Statics
- Calculus
- Hydraulics: Rotating Vessel
- Inverse Trigo
- Problems in progression
- General Solution of $y' = x \, \ln x$
- engineering economics: construct the cash flow diagram
- Integration of 4x^2/csc^3x√sinxcosx dx
Recent comments
- Bakit po nagmultiply ng 3/4…1 month 2 weeks ago
- Determine the least depth…11 months 2 weeks ago
- Solve mo ang h manually…1 month 2 weeks ago
- Paano kinuha yung height na…11 months 3 weeks ago
- It's the unit conversion…1 year ago
- Refer to the figure below…1 year ago
- where do you get the sqrt411 month 2 weeks ago
- Thank you so much1 month 2 weeks ago
- How did you get the 2.8 mins…1 month 2 weeks ago
- How did you get the distance…1 month 2 weeks ago


No it is not.
No it is not.
Arranged the numbers in
Arrange the numbers in increasing value: 1/6, 1/3, 1, 2. For a sequence to be arithmetic, the difference of two consecutive terms (any term - preceding term) must be equal. Let us check:
(a) 1/3 - 1/6 = 1/6
(b) 1 - 1/3 = 2/3
(c) 2 - 1 = 1
Since the difference of two adjacent terms are not equal, the given terms do not form into arithmetic sequence.
Arithmetic sequence must be
Arithmetic sequence must be in increasing and deceasing value.
No. The sequence must be 1/3,
No. The sequence must be 1/3, 1/6, 1, 2.
a, a+d, a+2d, a+3d. Where a = 1/3, and d = 1/3.