Active forum topics
- Ceva’s Theorem Is More Than a Formula for Concurrency
- The Chain Rule Explained: Don't Just Memorize, Visualize It
- The Intuition Behind Integration by Parts (Proof & Example)
- Statics
- Calculus
- Hydraulics: Rotating Vessel
- Inverse Trigo
- Application of Differential Equation: Newton's Law of Cooling
- Problems in progression
- General Solution of $y' = x \, \ln x$
New forum topics
- Ceva’s Theorem Is More Than a Formula for Concurrency
- The Chain Rule Explained: Don't Just Memorize, Visualize It
- The Intuition Behind Integration by Parts (Proof & Example)
- Statics
- Calculus
- Hydraulics: Rotating Vessel
- Inverse Trigo
- Problems in progression
- General Solution of $y' = x \, \ln x$
- engineering economics: construct the cash flow diagram
Recent comments
- I get it now, for long I was…1 week 6 days ago
- Why is BD Tension?
is it not…1 week 6 days ago - Bakit po nagmultiply ng 3/4…2 months ago
- Determine the least depth…1 year ago
- Solve mo ang h manually…2 months ago
- Paano kinuha yung height na…1 year ago
- It's the unit conversion…1 year ago
- Refer to the figure below…1 year ago
- where do you get the sqrt412 months ago
- Thank you so much2 months ago


You could actually get the
You could actually get the inverse of a given matrix, as long as the dimensions of a matrix is the same $(2$x$2$, $3$x$3$, $69$x$69,$ etc.$)$. Inverse matrices only exist if the matrix is a square matrix...
But for me, I could get the inverse matrix of a 2x2, 3x3 and 4x4 matrix reliably, but realistically, we could get the inverse of any square matrix.
But I don't know how to get inverse matrix of square matrix have many dimensions, hehe