Active forum topics
- Homework About Torsion
- Problems in progression
- Ceva’s Theorem Is More Than a Formula for Concurrency
- The Chain Rule Explained: Don't Just Memorize, Visualize It
- The Intuition Behind Integration by Parts (Proof & Example)
- Statics
- Calculus
- Hydraulics: Rotating Vessel
- Inverse Trigo
- Hydraulics: Water is flowing through a pipe
New forum topics
- Ceva’s Theorem Is More Than a Formula for Concurrency
- The Chain Rule Explained: Don't Just Memorize, Visualize It
- The Intuition Behind Integration by Parts (Proof & Example)
- Statics
- Calculus
- Hydraulics: Rotating Vessel
- Hydraulics: Water is flowing through a pipe
- Inverse Trigo
- Problems in progression
- General Solution of $y' = x \, \ln x$
Recent comments
- (a)
Max. shear at A = 12.73…2 weeks 3 days ago - mm equivalent of 6m3 months 3 weeks ago
- thankyouu!5 months 3 weeks ago
- z6 months ago
- Force P only impends motion…6 months ago
- Wow! :>6 months 3 weeks ago
- In general, the centroid of …6 months 3 weeks ago
- isn't the centroid of the…6 months 3 weeks ago
- I get it now, for long I was…7 months 1 week ago
- Why is BD Tension?
is it not…7 months 1 week ago


You could actually get the
You could actually get the inverse of a given matrix, as long as the dimensions of a matrix is the same $(2$x$2$, $3$x$3$, $69$x$69,$ etc.$)$. Inverse matrices only exist if the matrix is a square matrix...
But for me, I could get the inverse matrix of a 2x2, 3x3 and 4x4 matrix reliably, but realistically, we could get the inverse of any square matrix.
But I don't know how to get inverse matrix of square matrix have many dimensions, hehe