Discussion on: Solution to Problem 597 | Spacing of Rivets or Bolts in Built-Up Beams
Following is a discussion on the Reviewer item titled: Solution to Problem 597 | Spacing of Rivets or Bolts in Built-Up Beams. Feel free to add your own comments!
Active forum topics
- Inverse Trigo
- General Solution of $y' = x \, \ln x$
- engineering economics: construct the cash flow diagram
- Eliminate the Arbitrary Constants
- Law of cosines
- Maxima and minima (trapezoidal gutter)
- Special products and factoring
- Integration of 4x^2/csc^3x√sinxcosx dx
- application of minima and maxima
- Sight Distance of Vertical Parabolic Curve
New forum topics
- Inverse Trigo
- General Solution of $y' = x \, \ln x$
- engineering economics: construct the cash flow diagram
- Integration of 4x^2/csc^3x√sinxcosx dx
- Maxima and minima (trapezoidal gutter)
- Special products and factoring
- Newton's Law of Cooling
- Law of cosines
- Can you help me po to solve this?
- Eliminate the Arbitrary Constants
Recent comments
- Yes.1 week ago
- Sir what if we want to find…1 week ago
- Hello po! Question lang po…3 weeks 4 days ago
- 400000=120[14π(D2−10000)]
(…1 month 4 weeks ago - Use integration by parts for…2 months 3 weeks ago
- need answer2 months 3 weeks ago
- Yes you are absolutely right…2 months 4 weeks ago
- I think what is ask is the…2 months 4 weeks ago
- $\cos \theta = \dfrac{2}{…3 months ago
- Why did you use (1/SQ root 5…3 months ago
First moment of area Q on 300mm x10mm plate
Hi, i just need a particular condition on the problem to be clarified. It states there's a coverplate of 300x10mm rooted to the angle girders (at the top; and taking into consideration the same thing applies at the bottom) but, i was wondering why it wasn't included in your drawing. Could you please shed us some light on this? If it were to be included, i'd get 3,931,746 mm^3 as my Q and will arrive with 166.07 mm for an answer - as my largest allowable spacing.
Re: First moment of area Q on 300mm x10mm plate
In reply to First moment of area Q on 300mm x10mm plate by ce-mac
Yes you are right, the solution did not consider the 300 × 10 mm top and bottom plates. This page is marked for revision. Thank you for calling our attention.
Re: Discussion on: Solution to Problem 597 | Spacing of...
Where can i find the figure 5-32?